Well, the seesaw is just as nauseating as ever.
In the hopes that bad news spread is bad new diffused, and hoping that just telling you will somehow make me feel better enough to stop crying, let me just say:
They made a ridiculously low offer, and we made a high counter offer. We gave them until January 2 to respond, because we wanted to have the holidays in peace.
They rushed over today to tell us they bought the house next door, and have decided to build around us.
Merry Christmas, and fuck you, essentially.
And I drove home from the grocery store, $200 worth of holiday food and hospitality weighing down the trunk, as the tears fogged my eyes and the great wordless, noiseless sob rang in my ears and pulled at my face.
Pynchon says it's just a tactic, meant to terrify and cow us. Maybe. But how am I supposed to sleep at night? How am I supposed to get through these next ten days, days that, for months, I have been filling with happy hopes of family and snow and evenings by the fire and warm family suppers? When all I want to do is vomit? And I'm so scared I couldn't even bear to go to daycare tonight to pick up my daughter?
Friday, December 21, 2007
Lump of coal
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
An update on the house situation
First of all, thank you to all of the commenters yesterday: I put out a call for help and you responded in droves. It meant a lot to me, and it really helped firm my resolve to know that other people didn't find our distress unreasonable, our demands outlandish. I managed to only have a wee little cry today, and got a lot of strength from your support.
Second, we got an offer from them. What they did was pull together a list of ten 'comparable properties' roughly in this area that sold over the last year, and then circle the highest-priced one, directly across the street from us, and offer us at that much money. Yeahhhh, I went to their open house when it was on the market? And it's nice, but our house is bigger, better equipped, on a larger lot, has a garage ... When our real estate agent looked at the list, he actually laughed out loud: the list was cherry-picked for only the very cheapest properties, not actually taking into account, um, the actual houses being sold as actually compared to our location and amenities. Our lawyer also kind of chuckled, and suggested we firmly reject, changing all their ridiculous terms ($500 deposit, two months to just drop the offer completely, with no penalty, closing date six months away, ludicrous low price, etc, etc, etc.) to ones we feel are more reasonable and then dropping it all back in their laps for them to ponder over the holidays.
Third, our real estate agent seems to be warming to our cause. He's had a look at the aerial survey of the block in question, and it seems our property is so located as to quite likely make it impossible for them to even build a chicken coop without buying us out. Basically, they have an awkward, wedge-shaped property and to all intents and purposes, we totally cut off a good chunk of it. Pynchon and our agent are going to the City planning department tomorrow to investigate setback and parking bylaws. We begin to suspect that the reason these people haven't filed any formal development plans with the City is that they don't want us to be able to find out they can't do it without us. We imagine that this is how they intend to drive down our price. Our agent also loved Pynchon's idea of telling the condo developers that if they don't meet our price, we will simply move anyway, but keep our current house, converting it to a student rental to subsidize our new home. He thought that was a great card to play.
And so it dawns on us, slowly and magnificently, that we might be in the best position of all: we ask for the compensation we need to stay in the neighbourhood in a comparable house, and if they meet our price, then we happily move; if they don't meet our price, they can't actually develop the property, and we continue on here in our home as though nothing at all was ever amiss, building our equity month by month, paying down our debts, growing our salaries, watching Munchkin move from the toddler room, to the pre-school room, and finally out of that pricey pricey daycare. We would, that is, actually have a choice, actually be able to sell or to stay, on our terms and in our timeline and at our budget.
None of this is certain. But Pynchon says today, when he received their offer and told them our lawyer and agent would look it over and we would get back to them in due time, they looked ... a little nervous. We need to go to the City again, to try to find out how much they actually need our property. We're really not sure. But we feel a lot more confident today than yesterday, and it seems like our lawyer and our agent think we might come out of this better than we might have expected before.
Keep us in your thoughts, would you?
I promise, as soon as all this nonsense starts to settle one way or another, and as soon as I can relax enough to get my grading done, I will lavish all my attention on my neglected Bloglines: it's not you. It's totally, totally me. Sorry to have been so lax. I'll be back soon.
But for now:
Monday, December 17, 2007
A very Dickens Christmas
... with the part of Bob Cratchit shared between Pynchon and I. If Munchkin were smaller, she could be Tiny Tim.
Thursday, December 13, 2007
Braggy McBragsalot
I feel profoundly uncomfortable about that last post. Because of the bragging: my baby is so smart! Here's a list of amazing things she can do! She's a baby genius! I'm a Canadian; I don't feel comfortable bragging, at least not about myself. I'm also pretty stridently against becoming a competimommy, and, in some ways, isn't a recital of my own baby's accomplishments a tune harmonized against the example of, well, your babies?. However, I am a mommy, and all mommies (those of my acquaintance, without exception ...) are amazed by their children, rightly proud to watch them grow from pooping lumps to functioning human beings.
Still.
One of my earliest memories--I know it was before I started junior kindergarden, because I was home with my mother during the day--has to do with bragging. I was sitting in the big bay window in our living room, the window that looked out over the street. I was tucked into a corner, behind the curtain, breathing on the glass and tracing patterns in the resulting frost with my finger. Daydreaming. My mom was on the phone and I was listening to her talk: "She's just so smart. You wouldn't believe it ... yesterday she was looking up at the sky and telling me about all that she could see in the clouds, and she was making up stories and characters. Her language is very advanced. She's going to just do so well in school. I've been doing some testing with her, and she's just so advanced."
That's when I knew I was going to be a professor, when I knew that my future was words. When smart became my identity.
Like the typical first born, I was a rule-follower, a parent-pleaser. Smart was what I was, and I was going to exploit that to win approval. I did. As time passed, my smarts were an expectation: if my sister pulled B's, she was feted. If I got A's, it was wondered why I didn't do better. "But you're so smart," my mom would say, when I complained about this double-standard. No sense inflating my ego when being clever wasn't something I could really help. Actually, I did get an awful lot of compliments and positive reinforcement for my long, full blonde hair, something I had just as much control over as my intelligence. But I guess it's okay to brag about fluffy hair. In any case, the 70s and early 80s were not the self-esteem years of parenting practice. We were made of more stoic stuff.
My own smarts I experienced as a joy and a limitation: everyone expected a lot from me, but I didn't seem to get a lot of praise, praise I really really craved. My intellect was nurtured and challenged but I sometimes felt the whole person maybe got lost a little in the role of 'the smart one.' Yet I have always held that first remembered moment tight to me: I was special.
Munchkin sang to Mom on the phone the other night, and I heard that 30-some year old conversation again: "You know, I tested your IQ when you were 3, and you scored 152! I bet Munchkin is going to do at least as well! She's just so clever, it's a joy to watch her grow. Listen to her make phrases! She just picks it up so easily!" I never really heard that tone of pure joy, or wonder, in my mom's voice in the interim between my infancy and Munchkin's.
But? Honestly? IQ tests on 3 year olds?
And so, as I write about Munchkin's developing language skills, her zeal for books and her love of rhyming songs and nursery rhymes, I replay my own past in a new role. And I'm not sure what to do.
On the one hand, I feel honestly uncomfortable when, at daycare, the teachers marvel at her expressive and receptive language, at her capacity to be deliberately funny, at her developing logic and reasoning skills. "She's just so advanced--gosh, do you think her mom is an English professor or something?" they crow. "We'll tell you that, but we wouldn't tell the other moms." I don't want a snotty, superior kid on my hands. Also, I know that it ain't always such a blessing to be the darling of the teacher's lounge. On the other hand, why is it more okay to brag about someone's athletic ability (or long blonde hair) than about their brains? If my kid has a gift for, say, language (probably not unreasonable, considering the four combined English degrees that contributed her genetic material), can't I support her gifts with visible pride in them?
If I do want to celebrate Munchkin's smarts, how do I do that without implying everyone else is, um, not so smart? How can pride and celebration of this sort be uncompetitive? We are not flash-card people, and I'm sure as hell not adminstering developmental tests. Honestly, we feed her and play with her and bath her and read to her and she grows into who she is. But am I not stacking her up against the other kids in her class when I assess her gifts?
My toddler ain't perfect. She was a late walker, late sitter, a terribly crabby and clingy infant. Now she bites things and seems to be developing a pretty strong anger reflex. But she's smart. I just don't know how to say that, to her or to others, in a way that I'm comfortable with.
Maybe we can file this all under the 'making problems out of nothing' file, and have a good laugh later: you know, like worrying about whether to co-sleep or not to co-sleep was going to make all the difference between raising a psychopath and raising a Nobel-prize winner. Ha. Worrying, though, is something I'm good at, and you guys are a really thoughtful bunch of people to pose this question to.
What do you think?
Thursday, December 06, 2007
Whuds, whuds, whuds
In the morning, Pynchon retrieves Munchkin from her sodden and pee-peed bedding, strips off the wet pyjamas, and wrangles her into a new diaper and the navy blue Roots tracksuit we've come to call her 'morning outfit.' I slowly come to consciousness from my soft, downy nest across the hall and listen to them chat to each other. The next part is the very best: Pynchon brings her into our room, and she shouts "Wake up! Wake up!" and "Mommy! Mommy!" as all 30-some pounds of her drop onto my chest, a big warm toddler snuggle.
We like to roll around in bed all together these mornings. She snuggles her teddy bear and her doudou, and, if we're lucky, her parents. Recently, she has demanded to hold and admire the book I'm reading: The Lynne Truss Treasury is an 800 page monster, three novels and a slew of newspaper columns collected into one very heavy book. There is very little decoration on the cover. It's just a white paperback, with the title in plain text (albeit red foil plain text), and the tiniest, most abstract little doodle of a cat at the bottom. Well, this cat is the apple of Munchkin's eye. "Cat! Cat! Cat! Meow! Hug!" She hugs the book. She wants to look at the illustration on the front and then on the (quite substantial) spine. She hefts that book around on the bed like it was nothing. She has started to riffle through the pages, assuming, in her toddler ego-centrism, that all books are her books. She is puzzled by the utter lack of illustrations, if thrilled by the wind created as she pulls all the pages across her thumb and they whirr in the air.
"Munchkin," I tell her, "There's just words. It's Mama's book. Just words, words, words. Look at the cat on the front!"
Every morning she opens the book, thumbs the pages. "Wuhds, wuhds, wuhds," she repeats sagely, to herself. "Whuds, whuds, whuds," and then, more cheerfully, "Meow!"
Her capacity to learn wuhds-wuhds-wuhds has just exploded again, and Way the Hell Up North, retired elementary and special-needs teacher Gramma maxed out Munchkin's learning curve, with nursery rhymes they chime out in turns.
London Bridge is falling? DOWN!
Falling? DOWN!
Falling? DOWN!
London Bridge is falling? DOWN!
My fair? LADY!
She knows the second verse, too. And all the end-rhymes on Wee Willy Winky and Rub-a-dub-dub.
At home, she has started to answer some questions with more than a simple yes or no or grunt. Who did you play with at daycare, Munchkin? Nathan! What did you have for lunch? Cheese! Would you like to play or go in the tub? Tub! What song would you like me to sing? Roo-lf! [Rudolph!]
Tonight, it transpires that she can chime out all the line-ends and half-lines from Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. She chimes in with Reindeer! Nose! Saw it! Glows! Reindeer! Names! Rudolph! Games! Eve! Say! Bright! [To]night! Him! Glee! Reindeer! [His]story! It seems to me like an awful lot of words for an eighteen-month old to sing out in the right order and at the right time--her little leaps and changes, though, always astonish me.
She now knows, in fact, so many words that her father and I no longer understand what she's saying half the time. When her lexicon was more limited, we learned some of her quirkier pronunciations ("Abba!" for a while meant "On your bum!", "Tee-poo" means toothpaste and "Hanto" means elephant). But now she makes conversation in a language foreign to us, but obviously meaningful to her. And suddenly, three days later, we get it.
Wuhds, wuhds, wuhds. I really love this stage. I can teach her language; I can enunciate, I can make rhymes and listen to her, and explain things, and let her explain things to me. What a wonderful time this is turning out to be!
"Cheers, Gramma!" Woe betide you if, returned home, you mistake "Cheers!" for "Cheese!" because, believe me, cheese isn't a word to be deployed lightly around here. That took a couple of days ...

